The Incredibly Usable Cattail :: Botany

The Incredibly Usable CattailIs it possible that cattails were the reeds in which baby Moses was hidden? Their cat does include nearly all the continents. And even though cattails be wide ranging, commonly known plants, few know of their versatility. Nearly the entire plant can be eaten, excluding the leaves. Cattails were used many different ways medicinally, from a topical ointment to an internal remedy. The plants have alike been used in a wide variety of miscellaneous purposes. Mostly, they have been used for weaving, but they also have been used for filling and more (Coon 1960). Although taxonomists have historically had trouble defining a couple species, North American cattail nomenclature is fairly straightforward. Cattails are monocots of the order Typhales, subdivided into two families Sparganiaceae or the bur-reed family and Typhaceae. Typhaceae, the cattail family, is comprised only of the genus Typha. Four species of Typha occur in North America. The four North Americ an cattails are T. latifolia, T. angustifolia, T. glauca, and T. domengensis. T. latifolia has a range including Europe and Asia (Mohlenbrock 1970). In North America, it ranges widely from Alaska, through Canada, throughout the U.S. and into Mexico (Hotchkiss & Dozier 1949). It is common in every county in Illinois (Mohlenbrock 1970). T. angustifolia grows in Africa, Europe, and Asia (Mohlenbrock 1970). In North America, it ranges from the northeastward to the Midwest and also California (Hotchkiss & Dozier 1949). In Illinois it occurs throughout most of the state (Mohlenbrock 1970). Besides North America, T. qlauca and T. domengensis are also found in Europe. These two however, do not occur in Illinois. In the U.S., T. glauca ranges from the upper Midwest and Northeast down the Altantic coast to Florida and into Alabama. It also occurs in California. T. domengensis, being well adapted to unpalatable pissings, grows along the coast from Delaware to Mexico and also occurs in the So uthwest. Many common names are used for cattails. T. latifolia goes by the name broadleaf cattail, common cattail and soft flag. T. angustifolia has been called sign leaf cattail and nail rod. Blue cattail and blue flag describe T. glauca. T. domengensis is commonly known as southern cattail. Other names include flagtail, marsh beetle, blackcap, water torch and candlewick, cat-of-nine tails and reed mace (Coon 1960). Some Native American names have been translated as prairie chicken feathers, eye itch, and roof grass. Typhas wide range can be accounted for by several features both physiologically and anatomically.

Uniform Knowledge Attributions Essay -- Philosophy

There is a philosophic tradition going back at least to Gilbert Ryles 1948The fancy of Mind of distinguishing knowledge howfrom knowledge that,in which the latter is taken to be a merciful of propositional attitude, while theformer is taken to be a kind of ability or capacity. Paradigm examples are,respectivelySally knows how to ride a bike. (1)Sally knows that she owns a bike. (2)More recently, this distinction has come under renewed scrutiny, notably withStanley and Williamson, 2001 arguing that there really is no such distinction,and that knowledge howis really a species of propositional knowledge, thoughthe proposition is known under a different system of presentation than thetypes of knowledge typically expressed by knowledge thatattributions. Theirsuggestion is that all knowledge claims are syntactically and semantically uniform,so that philosophical parameter would be needed to support Rylesdistinction. In addition, they show that Ryles argument was flawed, and providean account that deals with m all other philosophical worries, while natural endowmentprima facie evidence that, contrary to what one might expect, (1) is not actuallytalking about an ability.They lay out first that Ryles argument in prefer of a distinction was incorrect.Then they suggest that linguistic evidence recommends a uniform analysis forall uses of the word know. Finally, they consider various philosophical argumentsthat might motivate a departure from the linguistic structure, and findthem wanting. Thus, they suggest that we should stick with the uniformity ofknowledge ascriptions that is suggested by the linguistic data.I will argue that the linguistic data are not as clear-cut as they suggest. ... ...y and Williamson allege for (1). (Interestingly, I haventbeen able to come up with any such counterexamples with how, whether,or why, just with who, when, and possibly where.) This differentstructure can then give rise to a different sort of meaning. Thus, althoughsome(a) at tributions of knowledge wh- toare similar in kind to attributions ofknowledge that, I suggest that the linguistic evidence does not immediatelyimply that all of them are.ReferencesLahiri, 1991 Lahiri, U. (1991). infix Interrogatives and the Predicatesthat Embed Them. PhD thesis, MIT.Noe, 2005 Noe, A. (2005). Against intellectualism. Analysis, 65278290.Schaffer, Schaffer, J. Knowing the answer. Unpublished manuscript.Stanley and Williamson, 2001 Stanley, J. and Williamson, T. (2001). Knowinghow. Journal of Philosophy, 98(8)411444.

The Round, Flat, and Stock Characters of Rip Van Winkle :: Rip Van Winkle Essays

One particular criterion image effectively supports the central idea in Rip Van Winkle by Washington Irving. The characters type set outs with the personality development throughout the invention. Three types of characters round, flat, and stock, appear in or so stories. The round character displays a fully developed personality and full emotions. Flat characters, also known as supporting characters, do not develop fully or express complex emotions. A stock character, also known as a stereotype, fits an established characterization from real life or literature. With these three types of characters leading the reader through the story, the reader learns the events taking place as well as the changes in the characters lives. The author keeps the reader informed of the changes affecting the characters throughout the narrative through style. When a character undergoes a fundamental change in nature or personality during the story, the character has dynamic style. However, a charact er without change defines a static character. Although all characters have a style and type sometimes understanding the differences appears complicated. A chart often helps establish a better understanding of character type and style. The author uses angiotensin-converting enzyme chief(prenominal) character, at most, two only the protagonist and the opposition exist as major characters. Rip Van Winkle, Washington Irving uses one main character to play both the role of the protagonist and the antagonist. In paragraph three lines, six and seven, the reader meets the protagonist. a simple good-natured fellow of the name of Rip Van Winkle In paragraphs five and nine, lines one and two, and one and four, respectively, the reader encounters the antagonist. The great error in Rips composition was an insuperable aversion for all kinds of labor. Rip would rather starve on a penny than work for a pound. Even though, in both cases where the reader encounters Rip Van Winkle, Rip only count s as one main character. Characterization occurs when the author draws an overall picture of the characters. Characterization happens in two ways in literature, by description and personality. The author uses the words a story to describe a character or imply the appearance of the characters through the text of the story. Introducing the personality of the character to the reader in words give or describe the personality of the characters or the words used imply certain things about the character. The protagonist in Rip Van Winkle the reader starting time meets in paragraph three, lines seven and eight, a simple good-natured fellow of the name of Rip Van Winkle.